?

Log in

What You Can

You know, a friend of mine raised a pretty valid point in regards to the Chick-Fil-A issue going on right now. He said, and I quote:

"Everyone who uses motorized transportation realizes that OPEC supports a Radical Islamist agenda which involves KILLING gays, right? But I guess quitting gas takes a bit more sacrifice than quitting a regional chicken franchise. If you are any kind of American consumer, you probably tacitly support thousands of companies and individuals whose politics, morals, ethics, and actions you'd find reprehensible if you bothered to research them."

And there is a pretty decent amount of truth in that. And my response to this is very simple:

You do what you can.

Could I give up gas? No. I'm moving to L.A. next month, and finding work in this economy without fluency in Spanish is going to be near impossible enough without eliminating motorized transportation, be it public or private.

But I *CAN* choose not to financially support an organization that funds and supports those acting against my best interest by having lunch somewhere else.

This, to me, is one of the major problems with the Conservative mindset. This sort of black and white, "if you can't fix EVERYTHING, why bother caring about anything?" attitude.

The point isn't to be perfect, isn't to aspire to some life where you never so much as step on a flower. In the modern world we live in, it is IMPOSSIBLE to move through life without doing at least a negligible amount of damage. It's unavoidable. That's not the point. And that's why it's called picking your battles; because some you pick, and some you don't. You *PICK* your battles. You don't sit back on the couch, comfortable in your apathy, and crack a beer while you watch everyone else die.

You can't jump into every fight. You can't even jump into every good fight. And sometimes, you can't even jump into the most important ones. But you can always do SOMETHING.

And you do what you can.

On political correctness...

You know, with all the comedian-related stuff coming up in the last year, I find the phrase "politically correct" thrown around a lot. And I just... I just have to say this. Once and for all.

Do I think that sometimes people are oversensitive? Yes. Do I think that sometimes words and phrases are changed for no real reason? Certainly. But that's not what politically correct is. That is to politically correct as drowned in a flood is to "Hmm... looks like rain."

All "politically correct" means is that you give enough of a shit about other people to NOT say the most offensive thing possible, to at least make an effort to be sensitive to other people. Does this mean you never overstep? No. I do sometimes, because everyone's line is different, but when I cross someone's line and they let me know, I have the decency and maturity to say, "Sorry 'bout that. Didn't realize. You okay?" I don't defend my every action like some shitty little seventh grader. And if my sincere apology isn't enough, well then that's their fucking problem, but I at least acknowledged my part and owned up to it like an adult, and the rest is out of my hands.

However, P.C. has come to mean something else in our culture, because assholes who don't want their good fun spoiled with something as tedious as empathy have taken to throwing it around the way McCarthyists threw around the term "communist." It's a liberally applied label intended to discredit and silence any voice of dissent. It's people trying to make themselves feel better about being douchebags by projecting their douchebaggery onto the general public, claiming that we all pretty much think the same things, and that if we just grew up and cut the bullshit, EVERYBODY would admit to being racist, sexist, homophobic, or whatever.

See, these people seem to have taken sensitivity and insincerity and erroneously conflated these two ideas. They basically claim that to not be a despicable jerk is an act of artifice, that nobody really cares about these things, they just say they do to avoid criticism.

Guess what, assholes. I care. I really do. I'm not fronting. I'm not pandering. I just give a shit. And maybe it's because I'm a kid who was picked on. Maybe it's because I'm a person who's been marginalized by society on multiple levels. Maybe it's because growing up, most of my friends were girls, and I actually had to think of them accurately; I had to think of them as people and not just mobile vaginas.

See, humor is the first thing that gets attacked. "You have no sense of humor." Fuck you. I have a great sense of humor. I just don't have yours. I laugh all kinds of stuff. That doesn't obligate me to think that everything is funny, and it doesn't make me lame if I don't. I get it. I'm a writer. I'm an artist, and I exercise my freedom of expression, and with that freedom, I take on the responsibility that comes with it. If someone looks at my work and calls it vile or a danger to society or whatever, you know what? I asked for it. Criticism is part of the deal. If you can't handle that, maybe you're in the wrong field.

But back to my point...

I really think we need to stop using "politically correct" incorrectly, because it's not about bullshit or insincerity or avoiding the truth. It's about expanding the truth, about saying "what you've said isn't necessarily a lie in some situations, but it's not universal, and you're acting like it is." I can't tell you all how many times I've heard someone say something stupid and ignorant and when challenged, clung to it like it was gospel, throwing the term "P.C." at me as thought to say, "You want to be some feeble pussy? Go ahead, but don't ruin my enjoyment of my comfortable ignorance and misinformation with your stupid accuracy and facts!"

I actually had a fight once with a middle-aged, heterosexual woman with little exposure to the gay community about the nature of gender roles and sexual dynamics in gay male relationships. She said some bullshit, I said it wasn't really all that true, and she just shook her head and said she thought it was. This really happened. It really did. She believed something and wanted to believe it so badly that she looked a young gay man in the face and claimed to know more about living as a young gay man than he did. And then she grumbled something about me just being politically correct.

NO. I'M JUST BEING ACCURATE. Sorry if that kills your buzz. Sorry if it makes your ignorance a little trickier to enjoy, but it's the truth.

I'm not poltically correct because I'm weak. I'm not politically correct because I'm dishonest. I'm politically correct because I give the FIRST SHIT about other people. And I can't please everyone all the time. Someone's always going to have some bullshit to piss and moan about, but the point is I at least try. That I make even the tiniest effort to NOT BE A TOTAL FUCKING ASSHOLE. It's not. That. Hard.

We're all adults. Try acting like it. Get a filter.

What Hurts The Most

Over the last two days, having spent some time away from the novel, I've really enjoyed the down time. I've been catching up on my reading, and that's great. I've also been looking forward to the material I'm about to cover. However, there's this phenomenon that occurs when I write.

I'm a big picture kind of guy. I've planned this story out as five books and have created roughly 150 years of backstory for it. I've mapped out character arcs and twists and turns: all of it. But I've noticed, as with other projects I've worked on, there's a world of difference between planning stuff and writing it out. I recently killed a character whom I'd been planning to kill since I was a teenager. I'd had more than enough time to prepare for it, and still when it happened, I actually had to shut my laptop and grieve for a day or two before continuing to the next scene.

A few days ago, as I was writing a scene featuring a character who is easily one of the most dynamic in the series, I visualized a moment from the final book, a moment that, if not his final scene, would be very close to the end. I've always known how his character would end, but never had any real specifics. Finally, sitting there, it came to me. A confession and a revelation, a cry for help, just four words: "I got so lost." I don't often make myself cry, but knowing the five books of story behind that statement, I had to wipe my eyes. It made me really think about the places I'm about to take this story emotionally, places I might not be prepared to handle.

I'm specifically thinking of a character who is unabashedly my favorite, a character who is carrying a lot more darkness than anyone will suspect. I constructed him this way, quite deliberately I might add. His story is meant to be painful and traumatic and disturbing, but in unleashing that upon my readers, I've realized I'll first have to unleash that on myself, and it's a little scary, because it taps into feelings I realize I have avoided dealing with for a very long time."

 

I am honestly terrified of going there, so, of course, there is this gentle voice, a ghost in my head taking my hand and saying, "That's how you know you have to."

 

And it's right. I do. Dammit.

Another novel update

Hey, everyone, check out my latest entry on my writing blog and tell your write-y friends.

So, I've been hanging out via a mutual friend with this guy Kevin. Kevin is a nice guy. He's also very conservative, nothing I haven't dealt with before. Kevin is pretty old-fashioned, and I'd dare to say a bit repressed to the point where he doesn't approve of nor does he engage in blow jobs, because he deems them demeaning to women. I personally don't agree, but whatever. I admire principle.

After the first night I hung out with Kevin, our mutual friend, with whom I was tagging along, told me that Kevin had probably been a little uncomfortable with my openness about sexuality in general and probably the fact that I don't mince words about my gayness. I believe that it took him off guard. I'm not a diesel muscle bear, but I'm far from a campy, willowy twink, and a lot of people -- a surprising number, even by my standards -- tend not to know I'm gay until something I say implies it. To me, Kevin had seemed unbothered, so I didn't think much of it and pretty much ignored what my friend had said. The next time we hung out with Kevin, the rebel in me tested the water a little and threw some salty comments out. Kevin did seem a little unaccustomed to my freedom, but not uncomfortable. In fact, he had a very good sense of humor about everything.

In the months that followed, Kevin and I started talking independently of our mutual friend. We Facebooked back and forth, we talked fairly openly about his relationship with his girlfriend and his sex life. I didn't have much to add about my own that would have been relevant, so the focus tended to stay on him. For someone whom I had been warned was really repressed and uncomfortable about sexuality, he seemed pretty open to me, but maybe that's just me. People do have an odd tendency to open up to me. I guess I'm just that kind of guy.

Well, Kevin invited me over for a guy's night. Maybe some cards, definitely some movies, without doubt plenty of booze. I thought this sounded great, so I told him to put my name down. He mentioned a strip club might be involved. I was game. I'm secure enough in my homosexuality to have some fake titties shaken in my face. Also, I really felt touched, because Kevin immediately counted me as one of the guys, something that would probably mean to a lot of gay guys a lot more than it should, because the general public basically considers us women with penises and chest hair. And we're not. This is not to say I show any disdain for, shall we say more feminine men who enjoy being counted as one of the girls. There's a wonderful and loving spot in the world for the Kurt Hummels that populate it, and more power to them, but I'm not that kind of gay. You won't find me in a sports bar (of my own free will) either, but I'm just sort of a dude, you know? So, Kevin's knee-jerk instinct to include me in guy's night really meant a lot to me.

I was pumped for guy's night, enough that I was ready to drive an hour and a half to show up. Then, this afternoon, I get a Facebook message from Kevin, informing me that his brother might be along for part of the evening, and that I should "ix-nay on the ay-gay" as said brother is pretty much a redneck. I wasn't sure how to respond to that. At first I was a little insulted, then I kept in mind who Kevin was. I also kept in mind the mutual friend who introduced us, who indulges his family in never mentioning the elephant in the room. They all know he's gay. They know his boyfriend. They like his boyfriend. But they, even his brothers who are totally cool with his gayness, never talk about it. They act like it doesn't exist, despite every bit of evidence to the contrary. He just indulges this mutually agreed upon fiction, and I don't mean to judge, but I'm judging. It makes me angry for him, at him, and at the world that endorses this kind of behavior. And that made me angry at Kevin all over again. Because the only gay guy he's really accustomed to dealing with is one that can shut it off whenever it's convenient.

Fuck that.

So I raged in private, letting the fury give way to a more rational voice, and when finally I calmed down, I wrote Kevin and told him that I would be sitting this guy's night out, that as much as I don't want to make a scene or make anyone uncomfortable, I came out at thirteen years old... in the early 90's. I walked uphill for years. I was beaten up, abandoned by friends, discriminated against by teachers who permitted bullying that they reasoned I deserved, endured hostile work environments because I didn't let hate speech fly and became "that guy" in the office. I have paid a hefty price every day for the last eighteen years to live my life honestly and openly, and I have never once regretted it. And I am not stuffing myself back into the closet now. Not for him, not for his redneck brother, not for anyone.

It's both happy and sad; sad that I'm still being confronted with stuff like this, happy that it's so shocking, because it's become rare enough that I don't expect it anymore. I'm not prepared for it anymore. I don't live in a world where I have to be... usually.

I will happily attend the next guy's night, but not before I explain things to Kevin, because I don't think he realizes how offensive what he asked of me was. I don't think he meant any harm. I don't think he sees anything wrong with his request, because that's what he's used to and it's the kind of thinking our mutual friend has enabled. I don't play that shit. I do not compromise myself to indulge the ignorance of others. Never have. Never will. Because I am not quiet, I am not convenient, and I am nobody's faggot, nobody's minstrel, nobody's pet gay.

I am strong and I am proud of everything I have endured to earn the freedom I enjoy. I'm a fighter and a survivor and a man of principle who has never backed down to appease those who would subdue me and erase me. Fuck to the no. That's not who I am.


      I am Michael Salvatore Mammano, and I don't sit in the back of the fucking bus.      

Sluts

This whole Rush Limbaugh slut thing has me boiling on a whole bunch of levels. I see a lot of people attacking (and rightfully so) the statement that he actually makes that there's a connection between birth control and sluttery. I don't really see it. I see a connection between birth control and responsible sexual practices, but that's not the issue I find most troubling.
I'm still bothered that "slut" is the worst thing someone can call a woman. First of all, I believe the term is unisex. Second, let's say someone's a slut. So?
So what? What is that a bad thing? All that means is that someone likes sex and they don't apologize for it. The question then becomes why do we as a society frown on women enjoying sex when it's something they were biologically built to do? Are we still stuck on this? Is a woman's sexuality so threatening that the need is felt to demonize it, to measure a woman's honor and worth and intelligence and judgment as inversely proportionate to how much sex she has or with how many partners? Really? Go fuck yourselves. Clearly, you must approve of that more since you don't want any women in play.
Seriously, most people act like there's a direct pipeline from the vagina to the brain, like every time a woman has sex, something is jimmied loose and IQ points fall out. It's preposterous, if for no other reasons than vaginal tissue is the most elastic tissue in the human body. Take that, puritanical douchebags!

The Ink Ninja

So, my friends' son Jack has developed an interest in writing, which I find beyond awesome. Only 11, and he's setting up his own website and getting his stuff out there. So, I thought I would give a plug here for my young friend Jack, who also goes by his pen name...

The Ink Ninja

Check him out, y'all.

Writer's Block: Fantastic plastic

Yes, and I have. While I did have legitimate reasons to have some corrective surgery to help my breathing, I certainly didn't mind having a little nip/tuck while they were in the area. Ironically, my septum has since re-deviated, so I will eventually need to get it fixed again, but this time, no shaping.

One vanity surgery was quite enough or a lifetime. I've got a nice mug. I ain't Jacksoning this shit.

Would you consider having plastic surgery?

Beauty-full

This post is the final chapter of what turned out to be an unexpected trilogy of posts about my grandparents. The first was about the loss of my Nonny, my maternal grandmother. The second was about the loss of my paternal grandmother, whom I simply called Grandma. This is for my maternal grandfather, Poppy.

I was on my way to LAX after an awesome vacation in Los Angeles (more on that soon) when I got a call from my dad, who told me in probably the most graceless way possible that Poppy had died. "Hey, Michael? You heard about Poppy?" Now, there was only one bit of news this could possibly be, so that was how I was informed that my grandfather had passed away. I love my dad, but... not his finest hour.

My first thought was for my mom. After all, for her this was a pretty big deal. It's sad enough to lose your dad, but this was compounded by the fact that she'd made it to her sixties with both parents alive and well, which kind of skewed her view of how life works for most people. If there is a good way to be spoiled, I'd definitely say that's it. I called her as soon as I passed through the security checkpoints and asked her how she was holding up. She seemed to be doing okay. I mean, as well as could be expected.

As I sat at the gate, I misted up a little, dry sobbed a few times, then I was okay. By this, I don't mean I felt hunky dory, but I was functional again. My grief was once more invisible to the passing observer. I wasn't trying for this. I don't have some kind of issue with propriety. Seriously, have any of you ever met me? No, I just started thinking about a lot of things. Poppy's death closed a major door, and ended a phase of my life. You see, up until this point, my siblings' and cousins' kids were sort of familial afterthoughts, cute little footnotes to the family structure. With all the grandparents now gone, everyone got an instant promotion. Sure, on my father's side this had already happened, but I'm not as close with my father's family and that was only half of me. This was it. This was all grandparents down. So, my mom's generation was no longer the parents who happened to have grandchildren of their own. They were now the grandparents, thus my siblings and cousins and I became the middle generation, and my nieces and nephews, all these little single-digit (with the exception of Kenna and Julia) cousins playing together, were now us. It is, more so than even my ascension to adulthood, the greatest paradigm shift of my life. My cousin Ben and I spent a good ten minutes at the shivah wrapping our brains around this idea.

I know I'm an asshole, making this all about me. Hang in. I'm getting to the part where I'm a good grandson.

I knew that I would be asked to speak on behalf of my mother's kids. That's just sort of how things tend to roll at special events. And I certainly don't mind. Of the three of us, I'm the best speaker and speechwriter. The trouble was, I wasn't entirely sure what to say. My relationship with Poppy had never been as well defined as my relationships with my grandmothers, which really says a lot about me, I suppose. I've said it before and I'll say it now. Nonny gave me my spirit, and Grandma gave me my heart. I had no idea what fundamental aspect of my personality Poppy had given me, and it made me kind of sad. This was doubly distressing as... well...

My paternal grandfather, whom I call Grandpa on principle but Nikki and Paul call "Sal," died years before any of us were born. I've never known more about him than I could glean in glimpses and passing comments from my dad's family, so in terms of grandfathers, Poppy was always my main man. He was the whole of what a grandfather was. That made him very special. And yet I had no idea where to begin. All I could do was piece together various comments and incidents from my childhood, some basic characteristics of this man that we all laughed about at every opportunity (with him, not at him). So, I'll take you through my process, and you'll see how I got to where I ended up.

Bill Friedman was born in the Ukraine, just outside Kiev. He came to U.S. when he was three. Yiddish was his first language, English his second. He grew up in New York City, I believe the Bronx. He was raised a communist, later leaning more toward socialist, but always a lefty, always out there fighting for the rights of the working man, on behalf of unions and social equality. That was his groove. When he was about twenty, he met a hot, feisty chick at a political demonstration. He promptly found this tough, intelligent, opinionated young woman (young but two years older than he was) to be the hottest girl he'd ever encountered in his life, and not long after that they were married. This was how my grandparents met. It also set a very clear precedent in my family of men digging strong women.

When my mom was a kid, Poppy got arrested for standing up for a black family that was being edged out of the apartment complex. This was the early Fifties, mind you. My mom wasn't ashamed of her dad for getting arrested. Not for this. She was proud of him.

Poppy was a jeweler. Yes, a guy named Friedman working in a jewelry shop. I know, a shock runs through the crowd. He worked hard and a lot. He was crotchety old man at thirty, but it was all part of his charm. He was famously high strung, easily irritated, and he was not fond of non-family members in his house (something that trickled down to my mother constantly making it clear to me that I was welcome to have friends over), but he was also sweet and the master of little gestures. He had that sort of mellow yet unimpeachable Gregory Peck masculinity. He was a real man, and made the perfect baked apples to prove it.

And dear God, were those baked apples awesome.

So, I'm thinking of all this stuff, and I'm still not sure what exactly to say about Poppy that anyone else who knew him couldn't say. It was all good stuff, but all of it largely factual. And I loved the man. I just wasn't sure how exactly my love was all that unique. Nonny had a very different relationship with every one of her grandkids. I knew Poppy had sort of a thing with my cousin Danny, since Danny was his only son's only son. He was the future of the Friedman name. But as for the rest of us, I really didn't see much of a difference in how he interacted with us. And that's no bad thing. He was great to every one of us. I just didn't know what to say. So, I kept on thinking about it.

Poppy was an awesome grandfather and lot of fun to imitate. Like, a lot. That early 20th Century New York accent was simply "beauty-full." Every one of the grandkids had a Poppy impression. It was mandatory. We'd all do our best to impersonate his gestures, his mannerisms, the way he pronounced Nonny's name "Leeza" instead of Lisa. That gravelly grumpy old man voice he was sporting long before he was one. You know, the kind of voice that sounded like he'd had a stomach for five solid decades (even when grinning from ear to ear). Poppy would often and randomly give any one of us a shmeis, a playful wollop on the butt. You never knew when it was coming. You could pass him twenty times without incident and then, as soon as your guard was down, bam! And you ran away, laughing. Try explaining this concept as a child to a world of kids whose only frame of reference in regards to gluteal percussion was disciplinary spanking. No one ever got it. Sooner or later, every one of us got too old for this, but he'd still hold up his hand from time to time, faux-threatening to shmeis any one of us, even the fully functional adults with kids of their own, but you knew he'd never actually do it. Probably.

And then, I realized it all. I knew what to say. What was Poppy to me? Poppy was childhood. He was fun, even when he was grumpy. When An American Tail came out, I thought he was totally awesome, because he had a whole bunch of hats just like Fievel's, and he gave me one. A blue one.

Poppy loved kids. He never asked us to grow up the way adults always do when they lose their patience with your perfectly age-appropriate behavior and sensibilities. I guess he figured that we had the rest of our lives to be adults. Why rush it? He'd let me count all his "belly buttons," as several surgeries over the years had left his chest looking kind of like a potato, full of little holes. I thought it made him magic, like some kind of mythical creature. I was four. I didn't know what surgery was.

Poppy never hurt my feelings. Others in my family made me the butt of jokes, often without malice, not realizing that you don't do that to a sensitive little boy who was always made fun of in school. But Poppy realized it. He never told me I was too fat. He never told me I was too weird. He never tried to make me throw a ball. You know what he did? He bought me sketch pads and colored pencils. He listened to my stories and came to at least one performance of every play I was ever in. When I'd bring a guy to a family event, he'd shake his hand and say "nice to meet you." Doesn't sound like much, but it was. And I loved him for it. You know how much?

My cousin Matt, the oldest of my generation, wouldn't hug me head-on for about fifteen years. For almost two decades, I got the sideways bro hug. It was a subtle little dig at me, and here's where it comes from. One time when I was ten or eleven, still really small, Nonny and Poppy were leaving a family gathering, so I gave Poppy a hug. I hugged him as hard as I loved him, lifting him off the ground even. He grunted a little and patted my shoulder. "Easy, Mikey. You're so strong." I didn't find out until years later, well into college, that I'd broken his rib that day. He never told me. He probably didn't want to hurt my feelings.

About a week before I left for my little vacation in L.A., I went to see Poppy. I knew it would very possibly be the last time. He was lying in that hospital bed they'd moved into his condo in the assisted living facility he and Nonny had moved into about seven or eight years prior. His caretaker, a fabulous Jamaican woman named Kalette, was there. Kalette's been a part of the family ever since Nonny died, taking care of Poppy and jokingly referring to him as her boyfriend. "Bill, what I'm gonna do wit you?" Fab-u-lous. Anyway, my mom had told me that the circulation to Poppy's foot had stopped and that the only course of treatment was amputation, the recovery from which would render him so out of it he might as well not even be there. He was completely disoriented half the time as it was. So, my mom and aunt and uncle decided to let nature take its course, and Poppy would be around for however much longer Poppy would be around. I understood. One thing I've been blessed with is that none of my grandparents went quickly. Their bodies wound down naturally. It gave everyone, including them, time to get used to the idea that they were on the way out. I'd been grieving for Poppy in pieces ever since Nonny died four years ago. It doesn't take away the pain, but it eases it a little.

Every time I'd visit Poppy in the hospital, he'd shake his fists at me like we were boxing, his old, spotted hand just pumping feebly at the air, challenging me. Far be it for me to decline. So, we'd box a little, knocking our fists together. Don't worry. The rib incident taught me years ago to literally pull my punches. That last day, standing there by his bed, he shook that fist at me, and we went a round. He won.

It was a good way to say goodbye, and when I was sitting im the terminal in LAX, I was thankful for it.

After the funeral service, before the burial, there was a private viewing for the family. After everyone had gone away, I stepped up to the casket and looked down at him, so gaunt and little. I smiled and shook my fist at him. "All right, Pops. Rematch. Come on, old man. I'll kick your ass." It was probably just the light and the angle, but from where I stood, it looked like he was smiling. And I cried a little as I walked away from the casket, knowing for the first time beyond doubt, that there'd be no shmeis coming up behind me.

Poppy was an impatient little boy in the body of an old curmudgeon. He was, as my parents divorced when I was very little, the first example to me that you could bicker with someone and still be madly in love with them. That fighting is a growing pain, that you don't walk away from relationships that require some regular maintenance and occasional renovations. He showed me that you were never too old to joke around. He taught me that men who appreciated and admired strong women were strong men. He taught me that I was exactly the boy (and later, the man) that I was supposed to be. He never had to tell me that, but I knew.

One last thing. One time -- I couldn't have been more than five or six -- I'd somehow scored a sleepover at Nonny and Poppy's on a school night, the best part of which was always breakfast the next day, because they had the Kellog's Variety Pack, which to me was, like, amazing, since we never had it at home. To my eyes, those little boxes were like those miniature animals bred in captivity to be pets, and I could pick any cereal I wanted, even the ones my mom wouldn't buy. Fuck you, Mom! I'm having some Frosted Flakes! Seriously. That was my train of thought. So, anyway, it fell to Poppy to drive me to school. I had no concept of time or miles per hour, and I was amazed that he knew what time to leave, how I'd get there on time, all of that. He was like a wizard. He was like Gandalf Dumbledore...berg. So, we're on the road, and he switches into the next lane, and I am wowed. All I can see is my view shifting horizontally across the lanes. It's just amazing. So I ask him to do it again, practically jumping out of my seat. I swear I'd have popped through the roof of his Oldsmobile if I hadn't been belted in. He looked at me, that old school fuckin' tweed newsboy cap on his head, and said, "I can't, MIkey. I can't just do that." I didn't get it. I didn't get why you can't just switch lanes all willy-nilly. And I was disappointed, but about thirty seconds later, for no reason whatsoever, Poppy switched lanes. Twice.

Look at that. I had plenty to say after all. Goodbye, Pops. I love you. It was ninety-one and a half years of life well lived.

Beauty-full.

Writer's Block: Love hurts

What’s the best way to mend a broken heart?
Short term: lots of booty. I would recommend fuckbuddies for this as you have no-strings sex with an option to upgrade to situational intimacy.

Long term: Chocolate, and plenty of it.
Okay, so I went to see the Newsies live show. Before I start in, I want to make two things absolutely crystal clear.
 
1) I am huge supporter of medium-to-medium adaptation, and I understand how it works, why it works, and why it doesn’t when it doesn’t. Turning a film into a stage play is a pretty radical proposition. For one, you need fewer scenes that compress the content spread out over more scenes in the film. After all, a cut of the camera takes a lot less time than the redressing of an entire set. Also, due to certain union and equity issues, the cast will be smaller and cast doubling, except in the most opulent productions, will be an inevitability. I understand these things. I wanted to put this disclaimer right out in front, so that people will distinguish genuine critical feedback with rabid fan dumb.
 
2) I really, really, REALLY love Newsies. I love it a lot and for many reasons. For one, I love musicals. Not all musicals, just good ones. Two, I also love period clothing. Three, I’m all for rampant homoeroticism, which leads me to reason four. I was eleven when Newsies was released. I don’t think it requires a hefty dose of imagination to understand why a film featuring a phalanx of adolescent boys in period clothing dancing through the streets of 1899 New York City in flawless, complex choreography and singing angelically in three-part harmonies would appeal to young, pubescent boy on the verge of discovering his homosexuality. Seriously. It’s hardly an Agatha Christie-level mystery.
 
Both those points being made, this little disclaimer comes to a close, and my review begins.
 
Let’s just put it out there. This play was awful. Simply terrible. Through no fault of the cast, I’d like to stress. They performed beautifully. But Harvey Fierstein… I expected so much more from the man who brought us Torch Song Trilogy. I mean, really? This… this?
 
I haven’t seen adaptation decay on this scale since The Last Airbender. Before I nitpick, let’s look at the most egregious changes… all of which were made for little to no reason.
 
1) LEAN ON ME – All of the ho-yay between Jack and David was leached from the play and replaced with ho-yay between Jack and… Crutchy? Really? Yep. In fact, Jack invites Crutchy to run away with him to Santa Fe, and this is a running thread throughout the play. That’s right. They have plans to run away together. David’s ho-yay has been traded out for Crutchy. Though, given the fact that they completely reinvented David’s character, changing him from a smart, educated, wordsmith who just kind of sucked at public speaking to a nervous, nebbishy Jewish stereotype, I could understand where all the fire went. Not that someone like that doesn’t have loads of appeal (he said, blushing) but why completely rewrite that character? It had zero impact on the plot. The only thing it served to do was make the friendship (or more, depending on your interpretation) between Jack and David less believable.
 
2) LES IS MORE – On the subject of the Jacobs family, David’s little brother Les is trumped up far more than he should be. Les was a pointless character. Aside from being the face of the younger newsies, he was really only a vestigial aspect of an early draft of the screenplay that contained a sub-plot about Jack having had a younger brother who died on his watch. Les was there as a surrogate, the hook that would bring him to David and his family. In and of himself, Les has no purpose in the final version of the film but to look cute. That’s it. Now, I don’t begrudge him that, but why in God’s name would you beef his character up instead of spending more time on, say, Spot Conlon or Racetrack or even Mush? I am at a loss.
 
3) HOW DO YOU LIKE MY BEARD? – The character of Denton is conspicuously absent and replaced with a young aspiring female journalist named Katherine Plummer. This was apparently done because Fierstein felt the movie lacked romance and wanted to inject a little into the play. First of all, I refuse to believe that Harvey fucking Fierstein, of all people, couldn’t sniff out all the romance between Jack and David (and, some argue, between David and Denton). All this homoerotic tension, which this film is (God bless it) positively lousy with, was the entire reason for the creation of Sarah, David’s sister, who was… yeah. Jack’s love interest, complete with meaningful looks, flirting, a romantic rooftop breakfast for two, and even a big hero kiss at the end. Did Fierstein just sleep through those parts? Was that not romantic enough? I fail to see why they couldn’t just beef up Sarah’s character and make her a little more active in the plot. There are plenty of ways to accomplish this I can think of offhand.
 
4) IN SO MANY WORDS – Given certain structural and character changes, it only made sense that a few lyrics here and there would have to be tweaked, but it wasn’t just a few. They changed lines, entire verses, and in some cases whole songs.
 
For. No. Fucking. Reason. Not to accommodate the plot, not to add depth to a character. These songs were fucked with just to be fucked with. See, when you change a lyric in a song, it sticks out like a sore thumb. It really takes you out of the moment. Your brain is trying to reconcile the song you know and love with what you just heard. Did you hear it right? Were those always the lyrics and had you just been stupid this whole time? And if not, why change it? This is precisely the reason people hate radio edits of their favorite songs, for example the heartfelt desire of countless people to burn all copies of “Forget You” by Cee Lo Green. The original “Fuck You” is so far superior that the radio edit is considered disrespectful to it. Same thing.
 
Medda, who by the way has no Swedish stage persona in the live show and might as well have been named Dried-up Old Vaudeville Cougar, had some of the best moments in the film. In the play, “My Lovey Dovey Baby” and “High Times, Hard Times” have been stricken from the show completely and replaced with “Crappy Medda Song” and “Crappy Medda Song (Reprise).” Why? Don’t look at me. I have no fucking clue.
 
5) SOMETIMES MORE IS MORE – You know what made those group choral numbers so amazing? All the complexity, the lines sung in counterpoint, the glorious flourish of Tenor I, Tenor II, and Baritone sung in perfect harmony. It had an energy and fire, the frenetic, petulant surge of testosterone that can only be felt from a group of rowdy teenage boys. You don’t really get that when you completely gut the songs, stripping them down to flat unison pieces. Oh, and counterpoint? Forget that shit. In the film, the end of “Carrying the Banner” is a whirlwind of an anthem, a group of boys punctuating each other’s lines with their own, declaring their love of their devil-may-care lives and of each other as part of this rag-tag brotherhood who are at once more innocent and care-free and more responsible and worldly than their school-going counterparts. It is a celebration, a blessed cacophony of androgens and brotherly love. The stage version is not. It’s a just a group of boys singing (again, very well) one set of lyrics in near unison. If there was any harmony, it was only two parts and not nearly pronounced enough that I could hear it.
 
Not okay.
 
As for the choreography, it’s very good and masterfully performed by some of the finest young dancers I’ve ever seen. It’s just a little too girly. Now, I know what some of you are thinking. We’re talking about singing and dancing in a musical. Isn’t that sort of inherently girly? Hell no.
 
In the film, Kenny Ortega’s choreography had flavors of Irish folk-dancing (woyking-class New Yawkas) and some gymnastics, but when those boys landed on their feet, they stomped the ground. They kicked the dirt, they spun on their hips and put up their fists like they were ready to fight. It really looked as though, given a little suspension of disbelief, this was the turn-of-the-century equivalent of street dancing. Yes, there was the occasional ballet flare that caught the eye, but this was largely the exception. For the most part, these boys moved with, to borrow from author Seanan McGuire, a kind of artful gracelessness. There was something defiant, boyish, and a bit cocky about their moves, something that gave you the impression that if you went up to one and said, “Hey, nice pirouette, candy-ass,” he would knock your fucking teeth down your throat before you knew what hit you.
 
The choreography in the stage show has an undeniably potent ballet base. Now, I want to be very clear on something. I love ballet. I mean no disrespect to male ballet dancers, because ballet dancers are tough. Ballet dancers are hardcore. They have a greater constitution and better stamina than most professional athletes, and they do it all with impeccable grace and poise. They have a control of their bodies that I will never even come close to knowing. Ballet dancers are the shit. But let’s be honest here. It is not exactly the most masculine dance style. I mean, this is exactly why people have been making fun of West Side Story for half a century. Though it has many strengths and is universally considered to be one of the greatest musicals of all time, no one is going to be intimidated by a gang member doing a pas de bourée.
 
 
 
Sigh. Okay, Fierstein, let me explain to you how a cult classic works. It is a film that, while not commercially successful upon its initial release, has been kept alive despite the fading into memory of shorter-term hits due to nothing more than the insane devotion of its fanbase. Rocky Horror hasn’t been playing in midnight shows for nearly forty years because all those people who show up week after week dressed like tranny hookers kinda like it. It’s because they love it passionately and beyond all reason with complete and utter devotion to what it is, exactly as it is. Change shit at your own fucking peril. If you’re going to change one single song lyric, much less replace an entire song, you better have a reason that is rock solid and airtight. No such reasons exist.
 
Okay, so from start to finish?
 
The show opens with “Santa Fe.” Yeah, you read that right. Now, they did something unexpected, which was that Jack is singing this song to Crutchy, explaining his dream to him. In the last verse, Crutchy joins in with a fucking amazing harmony. I still don’t agree with Crutchy even being there for that number, much less robbing David of his ho-yay with Jack, but it was an incredible arrangement. That whining I did a while back about no decent guy/guy duets out there? This is exactly what I was looking for.
 
From here we go to “Carrying the Banner,” which is so re-written it bears little to no resemblance to the original. It was stripped down, hollowed out, and left to dry like brisket.
 
Then “Crappy Medda Song.” You know, there were two reason Medda was even in the script. One, to provide the newsies with a locale for their rally, which in the play, never happens. The other reason Medda exists is that Ann-Margaret is fucking awesome and the world should never forget it. I love the character, but she might as well have been completely cut from the play altogether, because her crappy song and its reprise are so bad that she had no further value in the script. You might as well have eliminated her and just spent more time on the characters who matter.
 
“The World Will Know” was mutilated beyond all recognition. So was “Seize The Day.”
 
Pulitzer got his own villain song, which I’m all for actually. Makes perfect sense. Too bad it sucked. And speaking of suckage in Pultizer’s office, why are we wasting time on this useless, one-joke brainless secretary character? I seriously think it was just to have more token women in the play. Why? Not everything has to be gender equal. This was a story about newsies, the working boys of New York City (not that kind of working boy). Yes, historically there were female newsies, not many but I’d have fully supported creating one for the stage show or even swapping the gender of an existing one. I’d have NO PROBLEM with a female Racetrack. None. In fact, with Jack all up in Sarah’s business, you could always pair David with this female newsie. Instead, there are these contrived attempts to force women in where they narratively don’t belong. It’s obvious and lame.
 
You want more estrogen? Who is this Patrick kid? His mother’s looking for him. Not in the play, but don’t get me started on that. What if her “Patrick, Darling” solo in “Carrying the Banner” were echoed later in an entire song about her looking for her son who happened to be one of the newsies we only know by a moniker like Mush or Crutchy or Specs or Spot fucking Conlon? And they found each other again at the end?
 
On the matter of Spot, there is a number called “Brooklyn is Here.” It was good. Not great, but good and a good idea. Spot, however, was also largely phased out of the story in favor of… who again? Oh, right. Interloping Girl Reporter who sucks away more time with her solo, which was pretty good, in her defense. Oh, and useless dipshit secretary. And Trashy Showgirl Medda.
 
“King of New York” was pretty good, turned out as full-on tap number, which totally works for it. Well done there.
 
“Once and for All” was, like so many other song, a victim of lyrical mutilation.
 
Lastly, let’s look at some content issues. So, there’s this entire artistic thing invented for Jack. Like he’s a budding artist. What the fuck ever.
 
Also awful, Katherine Plummer turns out to just be Interloping Girl Reporter’s pen name. She actually turns out to be Pulitzer’s daughter. Feel free to read that last sentence again. Back with us? Okay, onward. So, here we have more of this contrived love story bullshit, and I’m about ready to claw through my seat.
 
Now, these two last points knit together at the end when the newsies pretty much win, and Pulitzer offers Jack a job as a political cartoonist for the New York World to expose the corruption in New York City. I’m not fucking with you. This happened onstage in front of me.
 
Now, I don’t know much about the actual historical Joseph Pulitzer, but in the context of Newsies, he’s the black hat, the villain king, the bad guy. Here, they have the character, after spending the entire play mustache-twirling over his own greed and corruption, doing an about-face and helping the underdog fight the good fight. Are you fucking serious? I mean, I can’t think of any reason they did this other than to have Jack end up in the good graces of his girlfriend’s father, which is stupid. You don’t have the hero bow to his girlfriend’s villainous dad, you have the girl break away from daddy completely to show that she’s going to follow her own heart and moral compass, whether that means getting with the hero or not.



So, I think it’s fair to say that this stage musical was positively made of fail. I love Newsies. I have loved it for a very long time, and I had been waiting for this show for twenty years. TWENTY YEARS. That’s the bulk of my life, people. And now… shit. Fierstein you should have taken a note from the Disney musicals that preceded you. Beauty and the Beast, The Lion King, The Little Mermaid… these were all movies that were adapted to the stage and were left largely untouched. If anything, content was added, but the parts that people loved, the characters and songs, they were left intact, and when they weren’t they were enhanced to turn them into showstopping hits. They weren’t butchered beyond all recognition because you have the fucking audacity to desecrate a cult classic with your “vision.”
 
 
FUCK. YOU. Fuck you hard and mercilessly over a dry, splintery fence. Without lube. And just you remember: we Newsies fans do not fuck around. And we do not play, ‘cause this ain’t no game.
 
And we got a ton of rotten fruit and poyfect aim.

My JFK

"Grown-ups like to tell you where they were when President Kennedy was shot, which they all know to the exact second... which makes me almost jealous. Like I should have something important enough to know where I was when it happened."   - Angela Chase, My So-called Life



SUNY New Paltz. Gage Hall. Room 104.

It was a Tuesday, a scant three weeks into my senior year. My hair was still long, my Murphy Brown-like revolving door of roommates was near its end, and I had just decided to move to California after graduation. I was woken by a knock at the door. "It's open," I grumbled. My friend Laurie, who I'd known mainly through other friends, poked her head in the door. We hadn't really bonded that much, and to this day I can only assume that of all the people she knew on campus I was the closest one that was currently home. But she nudged the door open and poked her head through and, in that adorable little squeak of hers, said, "Michael, the world is ending."

Now, my friends are pretty weird. We were even weirder then. The idea of someone waking me up randomly to spew cryptic and possibly humorous nonsense was hardly outside the realm of possibility, so I did what any of us would have done. I played along. I'm a good sport like that. "What are you talking about?" I asked, one eye open.

"Someone just crashed a plane into the World Trade Center."

Keep in mind that the guys in my hall were notorious for playing video games at all hours of the day. Violent, explosive games. With the volume at maximum. At any point, day or night, the hallway in which I lived could suddenly sound like downtown Beirut. So, I seriously considered for a second that she was kidding. Then I saw that look on her face, and I knew.

Someone had just crashed a plane into the World Trade Center. For real. It had happened.

I could pretend to remember more, but to be perfectly honest, the rest of the day was a blur. I remember classes being canceled and my friends Rich and Chris essentially turning their room in Scudder into a sort of news nerve center for the day. I remember running into my friend Leon in the Student Union and him saying something very Republican and overtly racist in his anger, and because it was the only way I could possibly feel normal, I fought with Leon Fredericks about something he'd said, but I don't blame him now. He was in shock. We all were.

I don't really talk about 9/11. You may or may not have noticed at some point in the last ten years. I have my reasons, and one day when I know what they are I'll be happy to share them with you. As it stands, I really couldn't say. I didn't know anyone in those towers. I didn't walk by them every day. If anyone I knew was directly affected by this event, I can't recall. And yet, something about me just shuts down whenever the topic arises. Like I don't have the right to discuss it because I wasn't there. Which really pisses me off when some schmuck from Colorado decides to give his completely unsolicited and culturally alien two cents, but I digress.

See, I write about stuff. I talk about stuff. I share my life -- often more of it than some people would like -- for entertainment value. Embellishment is part of the package. Usually not much. I promise you, all my anecdotes are at least 90% true. But 9/11... I couldn't. I just couldn't. So I didn't. The story I'm about to tell you I have never told anyone. At least, I can't remember telling anyone. I can't think of a time when I would have.

I'm notorious for my delayed reactions, especially when it comes to trauma. My subconscious is a very efficient machine that cushions me from the full destructive impact of my incredibly potent emotions and filters in just as much as I can handle on a gradual increase until I am able to process the full monty. You might recall the story of how I was totally chill about my Nonny's death until I was in the fitting room, futzing with my suit, and I cried for the first and only time on the matter. Perfect example.

After Laurie's little wake up call, I turned on the TV and saw everything for myself. I just kind of shut down. I didn't know what to think, and that infamous subconscious of mine cockblocked my feelings and told me to go eat. So I went to breakfast. I didn't really talk to anyone that day. I expressed my surprise at what had happened. I performed as was expected of any feeling person, but the truth is I wasn't feeling much. I felt like the coldest, most callous bastard in the world. "How selfish am I?" I thought. People are crying and shaking and downing coffee cause they're afraid to sleep. They're calling home to make sure people are okay. Their worlds are being shaken to their core, and all I can really think is... how long is the news going to be dominating every channel? Like, what if I needed a break from all this depressing crap? And from there, I would begin the self-hatred cycle anew.

I must have been the most horrible person in the world. I was convinced of it. Someone as bleeding heart as I was, someone so vocally compassionate and empathetic, and I had all the conscientiousness of Cordelia from Buffy. I mean, I was tucked away in my little hippie college town. Sure, attack on American soil. I knew it was big trouble. I knew it could be spelling major danger on a Nuclear War level. And yet I was seriously wondering if Oscars would be open tonight so I could get a cheeseburger and some Godiva ice cream. I was seriously thinking that.

I was convinced that my entire life had been a fraud. That underneath all the righteous indignation and principled rage, I was just a selfish, shallow little shit. The fact that I was even thinking about it was proving my own point. It's not that I didn't care. It was so sad that all those people had died. It was so sad that for every one of them, there were a hundred people grieving that life lost. I was offended that this had happened, because this was fucking America. We don't get attacked. We're safe from that shit. I knew that my friend Stefan, who had just joined the reserves to pay for school, was in a shit load of trouble, as was my new roommate, Snuffy, whom I had just started to like. They could die. Seriously die. I was thinking all those things, but I wasn't feeling any of them.
For about two weeks, I hated myself.

I was at my parent's house. I don't remember why. It was early, and I was getting out of the shower. I hadn't even brushed and braided my hair. The radio was on. I like to listen to music while I shower. It's a good way to keep track of time. I was leaning forward on the counter in a towel, staring at myself in the mirror. I cannot for the life of me tell you why. And then some song came on the radio. I don't remember what it was, only that it was some treacly ballad that was totally exploiting 9/11 by playing sound bytes from the news over the song. I suddenly got very angry. I was angry that anyone would have taste so bad as to milk a tragedy like this to sell a single. I was angry that there had been a tragedy to give them the opportunity. I was angry that my native soil was no longer a sanctuary. I was angry all those people were dead. I was angry that someone had thought it was justified, that it was a good idea. I was angry that lives had been shattered, spouses widowed, children orphaned, parents whatever the inverse of orphaned is. I was angry that it had taken me two weeks to feel like a fucking human being.

And I was really, really, REALLY fucking angry that this shitty, syrupy sweet, manipulative piece of crap was working on me, because under no other circumstances would it have.

I thought of all those people. I thought of all those human-shaped holes in the world. I thought of all of them and everyone they left behind.

I think I'd been crying for about five minutes before I even realized that I was. And I kept thinking "I'm alive. Not just breathing and thinking; I'm alive. I know because it hurts. Thank God it hurts." And then I realized how lucky I was and how lucky so many people weren't, and I then cried some more.


I don't really talk about 9/11. I've never really had anything to say. This was my something, for whatever it's worth.


We're done here.

RENT Rant

So, as I'm sure it's remained secret to no one, I'm in the middle of a little RENT renaissance. I've been watching the movie (and turning a blind eye to its many, many flaws), the filmed final performance of the original Broadway run, and I've downloaded the soundtrack off iTunes, having previously lost two different physical copies since high school.


Part of this little trip down memory lane has been checking out clips on YouTube of various high school and college performances. The results are appalling. I know we were never professional quality, but some of our shows came pretty damn close and if this is the best they have to offer, then high school theater in American is in a sorry state of affairs. I mean, this is RENT we're talking about. It's not like these kids have been condemned to stage a performance of H.M.S. Pinafore or even Bye Bye, Birdie. Hell, by today's standards, even Grease is kind of soft serve and lame. And true, this is RENT: School Edition, the neutered version, but it's still RENT. It's still a love story between a stripper and an unemployed musician who very likely requires some anti-depressants, both of whom have AIDS. It's still boasts a duet about a gay anarchist falling in love with a drag queen, both of whom also have AIDS. And lest we forget about the guy and the girl whose friendship is born of their commiseration over being cheated on by the same woman? Who's a performance artist? And if that's not enough, it's a rock musical. I mean, seriously kids, what else do you want?!

And yet, they suck. They're off key, they miss their cues, and they have like zero passion for the material. And all I can think is, "Listen, whipper snappers, when I was your age, every theater kid in America knew this show backwards and forwards and could sing it in tempo and on key. This is the cool show, the one your directors are supposed to be pissed at you for singing perfectly in the dressing room while you have yet to memorize the relic that they were actually able to afford the rights to. True, it's slightly dated. It's about the nineties, and you came of age in the aughts, but you know what? Until RENT came along, we did the best we could with Hair, so until there's an edgy, controversial, my-parents-don't-want-me-to-see-this rock musical written about the decade in which YOU came of age, this is as relevant as it gets for you, so stop treating it like it's fucking Oklahoma! and GET IT RIGHT!"

And now that I've exorcised that demon, I'm going to take it down a bit.


As I've alluded to in a previous post, I really don't look at the show the same way. My affection for it is no less, and I still find the themes relevant and the characters lovable. The messages of compassion for the homeless, of living in the moment, living in the face of disease or heartbreak or both, of people caring for one another and celebrating what they have rather than lamenting what they don't, of finding ways to connect to others in real life in a time when the internet makes it less and less possible every day... these still rock me to my core.

And then there's the part of me that really thinks that outside of the immediate crisis of Act 1, in which they are both totally justified and in the right, Mark and Roger should really just shut the fuck up and get jobs. Have I sold out, lost compassion for my artistic brethren? That's a valid interpretation of the text. Not one I'd agree with, but valid from a certain perspective. The thing is, having spent my entire adult life in abject poverty, stretching thirty dollars into a month's worth of groceries because I'm barely making the rent, temping from job to miserable job and never knowing for how long because my degree turned out to be for shit, having had to insist on coffee dates because it's all I could afford, I've really learned that being a starving artist really fucking sucks.

Now, there may be some people who sincerely enjoy living in cramped little hovels that they've managed to decorate with style and quirk, suffering for their art, and if this is truly someone's path -- and for some, it is -- then that's awesome and God bless them. But the other 90% of us grow out of that somewhere between 27 and 32, and even if we're still living it, if we haven't given up on our dreams, we've stopped romanticizing faulty plumbing, empty fridges, and a lack of legitimate furniture.

When I was in high school, RENT made all of that seem shiny and new. There was something so noble about enduring poverty for the sake of beauty, for the sake of blowing off the system and coloring outside the lines, for taking their taboos and enjoying them like delicacies. Now, it's like, "You know, there's no reason I can't do all that with heat, hot water, and a functional bed frame." Granted, I don't have as much free time, and it is hard to work on your art when you can't jump to it any damn moment of inspiration. I could be at work, bored out my fucking mind, and suddenly, the juice will flow and my brain, heart, and soul scream, "NOW!" and I can't. And I have to pray like hell that the momentum will still be there when I get home and that I won't be too tired from standing on my feet for seven hours and wrestling with the stress of having to accomplish a job to a certain standard with substandard equipment for pay that is beneath me. If I can manage to write ten pages a day, I consider myself productive. That's how bad it is. And let's not even get into how much sleep I don't get. And why do I do this? So that I don't have to live my parents.

Because clearly I've maintained that standard.

And I've suffered all this, and I think... Mark, Roger, face it. You do not work on your art with every waking hour. You actually spend most of your time whining about how you've got no material, an affliction I was never burdened with. I have so much material that if I'd had the copious free time you do, I'd be an associate producer at ABC by now. Ditch the loft, find a cheap studio apartment, get part-time jobs at Subway, pool your wages to pay the rent, and live off free sandwiches for a while. I mean, Roger, it's what? 1991? 1992? Antiretrovirals haven't been invented yet. You don't got a lot of time, buddy. You might as well face death with a full stomach. Splurge. Have a bagel.

And then I think, shit. Am I Benny? Have I become that guy? And I think no, but the only reason for that is that Benny was specifically written to be a villain, and as such certain character traits were ascribed to him to clearly paint him as a black hat. He's rampantly materialistic, he has no compassion for the homeless, and what's worse, it's explicitly stated that he didn't start out that way, that until the recent past, he was right there in the trenches with them but sold out those ideals for his own personal decadence. And, just in case there was any lingering ambiguity as to who the bad guy in this story was, the dude cheats on his wife, to whom he hasn't even really been married for that long, with a 19-year-old girl whom he probably knows is HIV-positive. True, he does redeem himself a little toward the end, but he's the villain. Let's not front.

However, at the core of his character, beyond the douchebag moves he makes in the musical proper, I kind of see the guy's point. Here's a guy who gave Bohemia the old college try. And then he graduated. In life, there are people who find a path and it's theirs, it's what was meant to be. And then there are others who think something is what they want, then they get it, then they realize it's not. I thought I wanted to be a parent until I was twenty-six -- twenty-fucking-six -- and then I actually lived with children full-time and realized, no, I was wrong. Really, really wrong. And I could pretend it's still what I want just because I've wanted it for so long or I could move onto what's right for me, whatever that might be, because this isn't it. At his core, Benny was just the guy who realized that what, for his friends, was a true calling was merely a stage of his life that was over, and he moved on to what felt right. Now, he was a complete dick about it, but did he really have to be? No. I think Larson really wanted to eliminate any doubts that this was the bad guy, and if that meant throwing in some mustache twirling, well then that was what it took. I, for one, always interpreted Benny's affair with Mimi to symbolize his affair with the boho life; it was a fucked-up way for him to re-establish intimacy with his friends by proxy. Now, I'm not saying Benny is the poor, misunderstood hero in all this, but I think it would have been far more interesting if the year covered by the narrative was sort of his last hurrah, if it was him taking a step back from the life he'd made and questioning those choices, asking himself whether or not they were the right ones. And that if, in the end, he realized that while he did miss the good old days, he couldn't go back now. Whether or not he wanted to be, he'd crossed over the other side and he belonged there now. For him to have a number, a solo or perhaps a duet with Mimi, where he revealed himself to be fully aware of how much he'd changed a mixed up inside about it, that would have been awesome. I think a Benny who feel more into the role of tragic anti-hero who does one last mitzvah before his corruption is complete would have been far more interesting and true to life than him just being the sell-out yuppie scum. I mean, that view is pretty fucking simplistic and childish.

And here we come back to my original point: that I don't see RENT in the same way. I still sing the songs at full volume in my car, and I'm not just paying lip service -- I really believe in what they have to say -- but I don't view it with the same absolutist fervor that the characters share. Because I've lived la vie boheme, and I wouldn't trade it for anything, but that time is over for me. It's kind of like when you're a kid and everyone older than you is a grown-up. I mean, when you're ten, teenagers just look like adults who aren't boring and lame, and then you get to high school, and you feel like an adult in a kid's body. And then you get to college, and you think "Why do these fucking kids look so goddamn pleased with themselves all the fucking time?  Are they unaware of how annoying they are or do they just wear it like a badge, because me thinking that behavior is annoying makes me the lame one?"

When I was a teenager, the idea of living in an impoverished metropolitan apartment, suffering for my art and still finding the day-to-day joy to love others to the fullest seemed like the very essence of enlightenment. Now it just seems kinda like kid stuff, which is why I don't hold it against the characters. I mean, they're what, twenty-two? Twenty-four? They're exactly where they're supposed to be. And maybe they're the real deal, and Maureen Johnson will be that cool aunt who smokes a joint with you when you visit her and Aunt Joanne to escape your humdrum life in Jersey. But my money says that a few years after her friends Roger and Mimi died (Collins luckily got on the antiretroviral cocktail and is doing great. He's made tenure at NYU and ain't apologizing to anyone for that shit), she put down the cowbell, took out her nipple piercings, and got a job as the manager of a small local theater, earning enough money to send your cousins (conceived by way of a generous donation by her friend Mark) to that good charter school with the strong performing arts program.

Where I once saw the kind of adult I wanted to be, I know see the age-appropriate phase I've successfully completed. It wasn't a mistake, it wasn't a delusion, it certainly wasn't a waste of my time, but I look at it like high school or college. It was an experience worth having, an experience I'd be a lesser person without, but you know, I'm past that now. I'm kind of like Mona Ramsey in Tales of the City.

"I need some security, Mouse. I'm thirty-one."
"So?"
"So I'm sick of buying clothes at the Good Will and pretending they're funky. I want a bathroom you can clean and a microwave oven and... and a labrador who'll know me when I come home."

I still measure in love and I still believe in my art and I will raise my glass to blurring the edges and crossing the line and rejecting artifice and bourgeois bullshit, but there's a difference between artifice and stability. Maybe I've sold out in my old age, but I just don't see anything morally bankrupt about air conditioning or digital cable or having a checking account. It's "Seasons of Love", plural, and I've just gone from one season to another.

The bohos in RENT, that's what an artist's twenties should be and what mine were, but my twenties are over, I've gone from spring to summer, and I'd like to get paid for my art, thank you.

The "Fandoms as Exes" Meme

Courtesy of TSB. I encourage everyone to do this. I even added a few at the end.


The one who seduced you, screwed you over, broke your heart in a million pieces, and laughed about it:

BUFFY THE VAMPIRE SLAYER - Joss can roll his eyes at me all he wnats and accuse me of "just not getting it" or "not appreciating dark stories" or whatever other bullshit explanation he chooses to delude himself with. There is no forgiving Season Six. None. And I'm not even getting into Season Seven. We're done here.


The old flame you don't see very often anymore, but with whom you still really enjoy getting together with for a few drinks and maybe a pleasant, nostalgic romp:

LORD OF THE RINGS - We've been separated by the years, and perhaps we've grown apart, but no one ever touched me like you did. Le melithan tenn' ambar-metta.


The mysterious dark one whom you used to sit up with talking until 3 AM at weird coffee houses and with whom you were quite smitten until you realized s/he really was just fucking crazy:

X-MEN: This really extends to all western comics, but none of them had me like X-Men did. From 1992-1996, I was your faithful and unquestioning bitch, and I'm lucky I got out alive. Multiple writers, conflicting continuity, no true mortality, a STORY THAT NEVER ENDS! God help me, I was sick, but damn, he looked fine on an empty street at 3 AM with the glow of 24-hour neon signs blinking on the side of his face.


The one you spent a whole weekend in bed with and who drank up all your liquor and whom you'd still really like to get with again, although you're relieved s/he doesn't actually live in town:

SANDMAN: Beautiful, smart, seductive, mind-blowing, and always good for a long, slow fuck that shakes your soul to its foundation... but I there is no way I could handle all that depth full-time.


The steady:

TEEN DRAMA: My one true love, we have our problems and our differences, and there have been times you've let me down, but in the end, you always find a way to give me what I need.


The alluring stranger whom you've flirted with at parties but have never gotten really serious with:

ROCKY HORROR. It's a fun movie that I very much enjoy whenever I watch it and I love the energy of the live show not to mention the greater theme of sexual liberation, but it never quite claimed me the way I think everyone (including myself) expected it to.


The one you hang out with and have vague fantasies about maybe having a thing with, but ultimately you're just good buddies:

TRUE BLOOD: I enjoy its company, and it makes me feel good, but at the ned of the day, I could never take it seriously enough to commit.


The one your friends keep introducing you to and who seems like a hell of a cool person except it's never really gone anywhere:

DR. WHO. It looks fantastic, and I really trust my friends' tastes and judgment, but it's been easily five years, and I have yet to succumb.


The one who's slept with all your friends, and you keep looking at them and thinking, "How the hell did they land all these cool people?"

For all my friends BUT NOT me, JAMES BOND: I just... Do. Not. Get it.

For all my friends AND me, I'd have to say HARRY POTTER. Take another look from a few steps back. It really is pretty fucking ridiculous. I mean, I still love it, but come on, guys. Let's be real here. Most wanton abuse of the literary "freedoms" of magic ever.


The one who gave you the best damned summer of your life and against whom you measure all other potential partners:

ANIME: He was my everything once, and I am forever changed. We can't go back, but I will always love you.


The one you recently met at a party and would like to get to know better:

A SONG OF ICE AND FIRE. It's so new and exciting, and I'm dying to know more.


The old flame that you wouldn't totally object to hooking up with again for a one-night romp if they'd only clean up a bit:

DEGRASSI - Oh, how far you've fallen. Get your shit together, stop rehashing characters from the original cast, and we'll talk.


Your hot new flame:

AVATAR: THE LAST AIRBENDER - After several years, you're still my hot new flame... a whirlwhind romance... a love deep as oceans that rocks my world.


The one whom you idolized when you were young and is still possessed of all the same charms you fell in love with, but stayed the same age while you grew up:

Um... RENT - It's still beautiful, still amazing, still inspiring, and the core message still holds up, but having spent my enitre adult life in abject poverty, I just don't romanticize it the way I used to. Call me an old fuddy duddy or a sell-out, but I need to have a bathroom I can clean -- for that matter, I need to have my own bathroom -- and yes, I'd like to get paid for my art, thank you. And Mark, Roger? I know Benny broke his word and that's totally his bad in this particular scenario, but big picture? Even Jonathan Larson had a part-time job and Subway is hiring, so quit your bitching, live on free sandwiches for a while, and use your wages to pay your fucking rent. We all have to. Even us artists.


The one that, after all these years, you still can't explain to other people, because you never quite found a way to explain it to yourself:

POWER RANGERS - I have given up trying to justify it. Love isn't rational.


The one you always wake up in bed with after a break-up:

BABYLON 5 - Whenever another story has let me down, I run to you, and a few days in your arms inspires me to love again.
There's something that's been bothering me. Not recently; for years. Pretty much my entire life. It's something I just don't get, and I cannot for the life of me understand how there are people who see no problem with it.

Since childhood, we are taught -- if our parents and teachers are even marginally competent -- that interrupting is rude. It can be a necessary evil, sure, but there are steps taken to make it less obnoxious. For instance, if you must interrupt someone, an "excuse me" followed by a polite request for the person's brief attention is an acceptable means of going about things. If it's a real emergency, you get a pardon. If two people are in the midst of a fascinating discussion on the latest feature film adaptation of a popular comic book franchise and you run up to them and shout "Someone call 911! Timmy fell off the roof and is bleeding uncontrollably!" I don't think anyone would fault you, provided Timmy actually DID fall off the roof and WAS bleeding uncontrollably. Aspies also get some leeway here as they're kind of colorblind to social cues, but by their adult years, they should really have that shit under control.

But for your average joe in average circumstances, interrupting a conversation is rude. Why then do so many people find it perfectly acceptable to interrupt someone while they are paying attention to anything other than another person?

I will be at my computer, writing or reading or watching some video on YouTube or Netflix. Whatever I'm doing, it could not be more clear that my attention is focused and that I'm doing everything in my power to tune out the world around me and maintain that focus, because I find what I'm doing very interesting or at the very least important. And then, some asshole comes along and just starts talking to me. And because I'm not a rude motherfucker, I can't simply ignore them, and now I have to deal with this shit.

 

Somewhat related: the phenomenon by which my mother will always wait to interrupt at :25 or :55 of every hour. Because that's not anywhere near where the climax of a show is.


My parents are the biggest offenders here.

I'll be sitting around, watching something on TV, clearly into it, when my mom will walk into the room, see me there, and decide that, FUCK, this is the perfect time to just start up a conversation with me about nothing of an even remotely emergent nature. It's never, "Michael, I'm running late. Have you seen my keys?" It's always something to the effect of "So, sweetie, have you heard from your old roommate Dan?"

What? Seriously? We just finished a ninety-minute meal packed to the gills with conversation. You didn't think that maybe that would have been a more appropriate time to inquire about my mildly estranged friendships? And it's not like she walks in, calls me by name, and waits for a response or for me to pause what I'm watching to give her my attention. Nope, she just hits the ground running, taking this conversation wherever the FUCK she wants. My consent could not be less relevant. Sometimes she doesn't even look at me to see if she has my attention. She just walks into the room, starts doing shit, and assumes that if she starts talking, I am all ears, like I've just been fucking waiting for her to completely disrupt whatever it is I'm doing so that I can give her my undivided attention while she multi-tasks.

My dad's no better. I'll be typing furiously, brow furrowed, tongue sticking out the side of my mouth, really getting down to the heart and soul of a scene, about to cut a character open and lay their essence bare in a climactic moment of revelation and catharsis, and my dad sees me wearing this face and somehow looks upon it as the perfect time to tell me the same lame joke he just told me three hours ago or complain about how the Republicans are heartless crooks (which as a party, not individuals, they pretty much are, but that's not the point) for the 457 MILLIONTH time, as though by this point in my life I didn't know his stance on the issue. Like this is breaking news that simply could not wait.

I understand that what I have come to refer to as "the sanctity of story" does not hold as much weight with some people as it does with me, and that's okay. It doesn't have to. But when a person is watching something or reading something, does it not occur to you that maybe they might need to pay attention to it in order to, I don't know, KNOW WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON?! I mean, is it possible that people as intelligent and literate -- Gods help me, LITERATE -- as my parents could be so casual in their enjoyment of film and television that they personally don't mind missing out on massive chunks of information about the plot? Or is it just, as Shane Botwin so eloquently described, "Mom's subtle announcement to the world that her time is more valuable than everyone else's."

This behavior isn't limited to my parents. I could be sitting around the break room at work, listening to music on my iPod or writing in my notebook or doing all kinds of shit that does not lend itself to divided attention, and people will just up and start talking to me. I mean, I'm a friendly motherfucker and I talk to strangers all the time, but not if they're doing something! If a person appears to be otherwise engaged, I have the good fucking sense to leave them alone. What kind of person doesn't? What kind of person thinks that everything they have to say is so fucking captivating that it automatically trumps anything else currently holding a person's attention?

What the fuck is wrong with these people?! What. The fuck?

The Zodiac Cycle

I've always been into astrology. I don't think the horoscopes in the Times are worth the paper they're printed on, but I've known too many hornball Scorpios, meticulous Virgos, and delusional Pisces to think there's nothing to it. It's a hobby, and I'm not fluent in the mythos, but I have a better working understanding than most. This is precisely why it drives me fucking crazy when nobody in fiction gets it right.

Usually, outside of his or her own sign, writers don't know jack about astrology, and yet insist on using it for a witty one-liner, a one-dimensional character quirk, or even a plot point. And they do it wrong almost every time. I remember several years back there was a short-lived comic series I read of, hyped in Wizard magazine. Reign of the Zodiac was about a world where twelve peoples, each for one sign of the Zodiac, were in the midst of political strife. When it seemed the writers were adopting the elemental aspects of the signs and using them as a plot point, I was intrigued and hopeful.

Then I read the first issue. "Steaming pile of crap" doesn't even begin to cover it.

In addition to being poorly written, they got the cultures all wrong. I mean ALL WRONG. Virgo, the sign of pragmatism, analysis, and order being represented by a shallow, foppish, decadent prince (and not in an intentionally ironic way) was just wrong. I couldn't even make it to Issue #2. Well, that had been disappointing. I vowed then and there that one day I'd write a Zodiac-themed story, and I'd get it right! And then I pretty much immediately forgot about it.

A few years later, I caught Ronald D. Moore's Battlestar Galactica, one major element of which was the Twelve Colonies of Man, Aerilon, Tauron, Gemenon, etc. I thought, "Okay, interesting. Oh, hey, Caprica is the seat of government and politics. That's actually pretty right on. Maybe there's hope." Then Gemenon became the world of religious fundamentalism (should've been Picon), Aerilon was known as a primarily agricultural world (should've been Virgon), and Sagittaron? Thinly veiled Christian Scientists (I have no idea). There was some minor improvement in The Plan, where Libran was noted for its court system, but for the most part it was clear the writers really hadn't given it much thought. And even when this was amended later (apparently, an elaborate document on the characteristics, cultures, and economies of the Twelve Colonies was written between BSG and Caprica), I highly doubted it was based on any kind of astrological lore.

This awoke the fire in me anew, but what to do? I had no idea. I mean, building a fantasy world from scratch... that's a tall order. And I didn't even have a story or characters to work with, much less a medium. That was a recipe for disaster. So, I thought, "You know what? Fuck it. Build the world. Build the world and the cultures in it with as much thematic accuracy as possible and let that world tell you what the story is.

So I got to work.

For nearly a year, I'd been devising geographical domains, ethnic and cultural templates, economies and religions for these twelve zodiac tribes. I took into account each sign's archetypical traits, its elemental designation, and behavioral quality. For instance, Aries is the cardinal fire sign. Active fire made me think volcanoes. This combined with the Arian tendencies toward rough edges and confrontation made me think of the Vikings, so their environment would be akin to Iceland, a subtropical volcanic terrain. And from there, I began to further develop the culture. And then onto the others.

And then slowly, quietly, a plot began to form. As it did, a structure came and I realized I was looking at a novel. And then I realized I was looking at three. Now, I don't subscribe to this fad nowadays that states everything cool needs to be a trilogy. Stand-alones are fantastic, but 1) The trilogy structure works well for a reason; 2) I've always been an epic kind of guy. My stories do indeed grow in the telling, sometimes even just the dreaming; and 3) it was just. too. perfect.

I decided to call the trilogy The Zodiac Cycle. It's simple, descriptive, got some nice word play going on there. Each volume would be split into four sections or books, each of those representing one of the signs of the zodiac, going through it in sequence, starting with Aries, ending with Pisces. Each sign's book would feature that culture in a prominent role, but wouldn't exclude the others. That way it would keep things from getting too predictable. Just because Leo wouldn't come until the beginning of Volume Two doesn't mean we won't hear about or even see them in Volume I, and other cultures could play important roles in the Leo segment, but Leo will prove in that book to be the most important. In the beginning of it? In the end? Who knows? So...

VOLUME ONE covers Aries to Cancer.
VOLUME TWO covers Leo to Scorpio, putting the sign of intrigue and mystery right at the end of the second installment. Nice!
And VOLUME THREE covers Sagittarius to Pisces.

I'm not going to give away what the myth arc is really all about, but I can say that as we're starting in Aries, the protagonist is a young Arian man of about twenty, and the story follows his journey though the world. Aries being the sign of energy, initiative, and impulsivity, it seemed a great place to start with a character, giving him a lot of room to grow from his enlightenment and increasing worldliness.

I am more and more excited about The Zodiac Cycle every day, and I can't wait for even more elements to take shape. Without giving too much away, here's a basic idea of what can be found in Volume One: Rising Signs.

In the first "book," Aries, we are introduced to our protagonist, Aerik, who is neither the classic hero nor the bad-ass rogue. He is simply a man of his culture, which will be admirable, repugnant, or both, depending on the personal values of the reader. In his efforts to find his friends, several of whom were serving aboard a ship that's mysteriously gone missing, Aerik comes across Sianna, a common Scorpian girl far from her homeland, on the run from a strange and relentless cult hell-bent on her abduction. Sianna doesn't know what they want with her and has no intention of getting close enough to them to ask. Overburdened with troubles of his own, Aerik is content to leave Sianna to her fate until he realizes that not only is she a useful traveling companion, but she just might be the key to discovering where his friends are... assuming they're still alive. In the process, they'll pick up lots of hints and clues that, while irrelevant to their initial goals, will awaken them to an impending conflict that will change the word as they know it forever.

No, they do not fall in love. Ever. Did you really think I was going to be that pedestrian?

More to come as I have it.

Sibling Rivalry

The following is from my writing blog. For those who haven't checked it out, please do.


I have been very busy these last few months. Very, very, very busy. After about a two-month detour from writing my first novel, time spent prepping the pilot script and pitch materials for an opportunity that fell through at the last minute, I'm now back in a prose groove. It took some doing, but I'm here.

My novel, the first book in a planned pentalogy, is a labor of love. When people ask me how long I've been working on it, it's a difficult question to answer. Perhaps because there are several answers. Any writer can tell you that projects shift and change, stories grow in the telling, as Tolkien once said. So, how long have I been working on it?

I came up with the original idea for The Crossroads Chronicles, then a TV series called Crossroads, early in my senior year of high school, in late 1997.

I came up with the greater idea, of which the original idea was merely one element, about a year later.
 
I wrote the pilot script shortly thereafter.

I wrote several revisions and completely different scripts over the next few years.

I realized the story would be better served in prose than as a TV series, and made the decision to convert everything over in 2007, nearly a decade after I'd had the initial idea. I wrote the first three or four chapters when I realized that I was having far too much trouble, and that it was time to do what I'd been putting off for a long, long time: writing the backstory. Three years later, I was done. Trust me, it's very elaborate.

This past winter, I sat down and got back to writing the actual narrative. After some fooling with format and structure, I found my groove. I'm now back in the swing. It's coming along great, and I'm extremely excited.

Here's the funny:

I have another prose project, a story I've wanted to tackle for a while, one that I've only recently decided should be prose. Unlike The Crossroads Chronicles, which takes place here in the world we know, this project is a fantasy epic, which meant building the world from scratch. As one might imagine, that's a LOT of work. It was only a year ago that I finally took that idea, the vaguest of concepts, and actually started working out a story. As of today, I have developed that world significantly. I've got miles to go, but it's a solid start. I also have the basic story in mind, though the details are still very vague. I have a flawed, compelling protagonist, three supporting protagonists, one minor character of ambiguous alignment, and an antagonist group, if not specific antagonist characters yet.

Most people would think that this is a sign that the latter project is better. After all, it's coming together so easily and with such strength that it must be a stronger idea, certainly more so than The Crossroads Chronicles, which has been evolving slowly over nearly fifteen years. Most people would think so.

Most people aren't writers.

The thing is, stories are like kids: they're different and grow at different speeds in different directions. They require different amounts of attention, different types of nurturing, different levels of patience, and different degrees of analysis.

The Crossroads Chronicles is close to my heart. It's a story with characters I love and a message -- more than one, actually -- that I deeply believe in. And it's taking its time. And that's okay. It will mature and come of age on its own schedule, not mine. I've tried to force the hand of evolution. It never works. This new story, it's flowing nicely. I won't be starting on the narrative any time soon, probably not for a year or two at least, and I'm not worried about it.

Things will ebb and flow, and you have to let them. There's something to be said for discipline, for just sitting down and pushing through a problem or a block, but you can't run a current through a burnt out circuit. More and more, I've found my greatest strength in my craft is trusting in my instincts, the things that can't be taught, my writer's intuition, if you will.

I don't treat these projects equally. Like a good parent, I give each of my kids what they need (if not what they want) when they need it. And we're all of us doing just fine.


For details on this new project, see my next post.

Writer's Block: Happily ever after…

What's Harry going to do now that the series is over?

Getting himself a big ol' butterbeer belly.

Why Not?

To all my conservative friends, the following is meant to be neither inflammatory nor insulting. I'm not picking a fight. I'm just thinking out loud, or rather on the page, and I welcome any civil disagreement for discussion. I'm always open to intelligent disagreement.

It was a while back that I realized that my mom is conservative. Not politically or economically. She's a card carrying Democrat, through and through. She believes in collective bargaining, socialized healthcare, civil rights... all that jazz. But whenever she says she's liberal, I kind of have to snort down a chuckle, because I guess she kind of is, after a fashion. I mean, she's super liberal... for, like, 1965.

The truth is, for someone so adamantly matriarchal -- she'll say her marriages were all equal partnerships, but no one is buying that party line nor have they ever -- she's taken all three of her husbands' names. She never even considered keeping hers, and that's fine. It's a personal choice, but she never actually made it. She just went with the establishment. She's cool with gay people and supports gay marriage and parenthood, but when her son came out, it took her years to accept that it was 1) actually real, and 2) not "caused" by something. She believes sex is natural and healthy... as long as it's between two people who've known each other for a while... and only if it's done in a bedroom... in a bed... at night... in the dark. And you never, ever, ever talk about it, except in the most clinical or euphemistic terms. She loves folk art and world music. She'll listen to Paul Simon's Afro-inspired stuff and totally dig on it, but openly pokes fun of the rhythms, styling, and vocal runs of Hip Hop, which is a direct musical descendant of many of the techniques of traditional African music, such as call and response, tonal fluctuation, etc. She's all about the arts and self-expression, but anyone with dyed hair or a pierced nose is "out to lunch" or just acting out unnecessarily or trying to piss off their parents. It couldn't possibly be because they thought having purple hair might look kinda neat.

And I realized then that my mom isn't a liberal. She's a conservative who votes Democrat. And this led me to really think about the defining difference between the conservative and liberal mindsets.

Whether political or social or just down to the matter of personal expression, it's that conservatives ask why. Why do this? Why talk about this? Why make movies or TV shows about this? Why wear that outfit? Why be so fucking weird?

Liberals ask "Why not?"


Why shouldn't I? Why wouldn't I? Why does it bother you so much if I do?


Yeah, Lady Gaga is weird. Why shouldn't she be, and does it invalidate her musical innovation, whether you're partial to her style or not?

Why shouldn't there be a TV show on a major network with multiple gay storylines when almost every other show on almost every other channel doesn't? Have you lost so much precious screentime?

Indeed I talk about sex a lot. Why shouldn't I? It's a major part of my life, more than a lot of people's, and my conversation reflects that. If you don't like it, I won't have that conversation with you. Why does it bother you if I have it with other people? Why do the topics of my personal discussion become a matter of principle rather than a matter of personal taste?

Why shouldn't I listen to Japanese or Russian pop music without you rolling your eyes at me? Why shouldn't I speak Spanish or Chinese or Tagalog in front of you if I'm not talking to you? Does not being able to eavesdrop on my conversation, in which you are completely uninvolved, offend you on some profound level? Or is it just the reminder that other languages exist?

Why shouldn't I have a husband? Why shouldn't I have two? Why shouldn't the paradigm of the American family change or diversify? It's not like it's going to erase yours. Yours will still be whatever you want it to be. Why shouldn't mine? What does it take away from you? Why shouldn't I dress however I want? Fuck whomever I want? Marry whomever I want? As many as I want? Why shouldn't I remain childless?

Why shouldn't my life be completely different from yours? Why shouldn't I make different choices? And why shouldn't I be afforded the same basic respect if I do?


Why not?

It's not gay enough

What could he be talking about, most of you are probably wondering.

Duets. That's what I'm talking about, specifically duets between two guys. I've been listening to my Glee soundtracks at length -- as is proper -- and I've noticed something. None of the Kurt/Blaine songs really sound like a duet between two boys. I mean no disrespect to Chris Colfer, who is an amazing talent on many levels, and I praise Glee for having a musical part for a countertenor. However -- and Glee isn't the only culprit here -- I've found gay duets aren't really all that gay. They all default on a heteronormative ideal of a moderately high male voice and an essentially female voice.

Think about it. Every gay love song -- and there aren't many -- is between a slightly to moderately masculine guy, usually a tenor, and either another guy who is so effeminate in both sensibilities and vocal range that he might as well be a chick OR just a straight up drag queen. I'm not personally getting enough of a sense of this being a song between two guys. I'm not saying they gotta be big, hulking bears or anything (though I would pay good money to see that number) but just imagine it:

A stirring power ballad between a Second Tenor and nice, rich, mid-range Baritone. You know, a song where they're not trumpeting their voices singing about brotherhood and war or something. A strong, intimate ballad between two voices in that rich, velvety lower register. Why has this not happened? And am I gonna have to write this musical? Because I can't write music.

But this is something that really bugs me. We're so used to the musical combination of voices we think a love song is supposed to sound like, that's really all we ever get. So, let's gay it up people. Let's make those guy on guy duets a little more manly, and thus, a little more gay.

Profile

All Growed Up
manwe_iluvendil
Talks To Strangers

Latest Month

July 2012
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Syndicate

RSS Atom
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Akiko Kurono